This insight groups each member's pro-Israel campaign money by committee assignment, within chamber. Members on the panels with jurisdiction over foreign policy, defense, and federal spending receive more than the typical member of their chamber. Within the four committees that shape Israel policy — Foreign Affairs/Relations, Appropriations, Armed Services, and Intelligence — chairs and ranking members tend to raise more than the rank-and-file of those same committees (clearest in the House), and sitting on one of those four tracks a jump in money over sitting on none — though sitting on two or more does not add more, and that group is small enough that we flag it rather than lean on it. What does NOT predict more money is the total number of committees a member sits on. The relationship is correlational, not causal.