S 170: Combating BDS Act of 2017

Congress: 115 · Status: active · Israel/Palestine classification: pro-Israel

Data (JSON) — machine-readable record of this bill (identifiers, sponsor, classification, actions, and the member-by-member vote breakdown).

Official record on Congress.gov — full text, actions, and cosponsor history for S 170.

Sponsor: Rubio, Marco (R-FL)

Summary

Combating BDS Act of 2017 This bill allows a state or local government to adopt and enforce measures to divest its assets from, prohibit investment of its assets in, or restrict contracting with: (1) an entity that engages in a commerce- or investment-related boycott, divestment, or sanctions activity targeting Israel; or (2) an entity that owns or controls, is owned or controlled by, or is under common ownership or control with such an entity. Such measures are not preempted by federal law. A state or local government that seeks to adopt or enforce such measures shall comply with specified requirements related to notice, timing, and opportunity for comment. In addition, the bill amends the Investment Company Act of 1940 to prohibit a person from bringing any civil, criminal, or administrative action against a registered investment company based solely upon that company's divestment from securities issued by a person that engages in a commerce- or investment-related boycott, divestment, or sanctions activity targeting Israel.

Editorial Explainer

This bill lets states and local governments divest public money from, refuse to invest in, or stop contracting with companies that boycott Israel or are owned by companies that boycott Israel. It also shields investment funds from lawsuits if they divest from Israel-boycotting companies. States and localities must follow notice and comment procedures before adopting such measures.

Why it matters

This enables state and local governments to use public funds as a tool to penalize BDS (boycott, divestment, sanctions) activity targeting Israel, while protecting investment companies that divest from Israel from legal challenge. It represents a significant shift in allowing sub-federal entities to adopt Israel-specific investment policy.

Cosponsors (48)