Is Chris Deluzio pro-Israel or pro-Palestine?

Where does Chris Deluzio stand on Israel?

Chris Deluzio (Democrat, Pennsylvania) is tied for the 364th most pro-Israel record in the US House, with a net score of +1: 6 cosponsorships and 8 aligned floor votes on the pro-Israel side, against 6 cosponsorships and 7 votes on the pro-Palestine side.

Net score breakdown

Weights: sponsoring a scored bill 3 points, authoring a scored amendment 3 points, cosponsoring a scored bill 2 points, an aligned floor vote 1 point.

• Pro-Israel activity (additions): 6 cosponsored bills × 2 = 12 points; 8 aligned floor votes × 1 = 8 points. Subtotal: 20 points pro-Israel.
• Pro-Palestine activity (deduction): 6 cosponsored bills × 2 = 12 points; 7 aligned floor votes × 1 = 7 points. Subtotal: 19 points pro-Palestine.
• Net score: +1 pro-Israel (20 pro-Israel points minus 19 pro-Palestine points).

Campaign finance

2026 cycle, source: FEC, filings through 2026-10-14. Total raised: $3,815,970. Total spent: $2,945,682. Cash on hand: $1,223,960.

Pro-Israel money

Hardline pro-Israel money supporting Deluzio: $184,600 (2022–2026, 2 PACs, 11 donors, 33 bundled).

Pro-Israel money spent AGAINST Deluzio: $0. No tracked pro-Israel money spent against this member.

Where the supporting money comes from

• PAC money: $7,430 (4%, routed + independent expenditures).
• Individual donors: $149,070 (77%, 11 named individuals), of which $7,300 was routed through conduits and is counted once, under bundled.
• Bundled / earmarked: $35,400 (19%, 33 conduit donors).

How the buckets add up to $184,600: PAC money $7,430, plus named individual donors $149,070, minus $7,300 routed through conduits by 4 of those donors (counted once under bundled), plus bundled / earmarked $35,400, equals $184,600 hardline pro-Israel money supporting Deluzio.

Liberal pro-Israel (J Street) money: $275,440, tracked in its own tier and not included in the hardline total.

Full committee and donor lists: Israel/Palestine campaign finance.

Scoring and classification: VoteLog methodology.